|
Characterizing
Space Flight Inductors and Transformer Failures
Ben
Oni, Ph.D., NASA MSFC/Tuskegee University
Trent
Griffin, Karen Cunningham, Bob Kapustka, and Steve Luna, NASA MSFC,
Huntsville, Alabama 35812
Abstract
Various design
and manufacturing standards are generally imposed on space flight
hardware development processes with the objective to reduce failure
risks. In spite of these standards, some chip scale package (CSP)
assemblies and discrete components used in power electronics hardware
developments still fail in use and require understanding of the
failure mechanisms to establish improved confidence in reliability.
Failures of space flight inductors and transformers, developed to
MIL-STD 981, were studied. The paper characterized the failures
in terms of type, cause, method of detection, and frequency of occurrences.
The principal
objective for the characterization was to see if there are correlations
between the type of failures and the testing and/or analysis that
is or is not performed. If it could be determined that the performance
of certain tests and/or analyses on power electronics hardware greatly
enhance mission success and that the performance of other tests
and/or analyses do not, then one would be able to better advise
the customer on which test and/or analysis options would give the
best value.
Available records,
over the last 32 years, of failure data on space flight inductors
and transformers were sought from several sources and analyzed.
The sources included the Government Industry Data Exchange Program
(GIDEP), NASA Reliability Preferred Practices for Design and Test
regarding Lessons Learned Information, Magnetics Manufacturers,
and Electronic Screening Houses.
The paper also
presents the relative importance of the various MIL-STD 981 tests,
as perceived by manufacturers of inductors and transformers.
Conclusions
Based on the
available GIDEP data used in this analysis, the following conclusions
were made:
- Magnetic
components fail more in the open circuit mode than in the short
circuit mode.
- More failures
result from manufacturing errors than from design or installation
errors.
- Advances
in manufacturing technology do not show decline in manufacturing
related failures with years.
- More components
fail the thermal cycle test than other tests.
- About 20%
of failures occur in use.
- Failure occurring
in use is caused by a number of reasons; however, insulation breakdown
and improper solder joints are more prevalent causes.
On the
relative importance of MIL-STD 981 tests as perceived by manufacturers
of inductors and transformers, the following conclusions were
made:
- Tests performed
depend on customer applications.
- Irrespective
of application, the majority of magnetics manufacturers consider
dielectric and electrical tests as highest priority.
- Seal and
radiographic tests were generally considered least critical. It
is noted, however, that in some applications, these tests may
be absolutely necessary.
The full-length
paper is posted on the NEPP Web site. Click here to view.
|