|
Assessment
of Advanced Flip-Chip Electronics Package
Test Assemblies Under Extreme Temperatures
Rajeshuni
Ramesham, NASA JPL/California Institute of Technology
Rajeshuni.Ramesham@jpl.nasa.gov,
818.354.7190
Abstract
FB250
and FB500 flip-chip boards have been assembled and subjected to
extreme temperature thermal cycling in order to evaluate the robustness
of this advanced packaging technology. The temperature range covers
military specifications and the extreme Martian environment at various
ramp rates. Resistance of the daisy chained flip chips has been
monitored as a function of thermal cycling. Preliminary electrical
resistance measurements have been reported; electrical tests to
date have not shown significant change in resistance as a function
of thermal cycling. However, the greater the number of thermal cycles,
the more noticeable the change in the resistance of the daisy chained
flip chips. No catastrophic failures were observed, even after 481
extreme temperature thermal cycles per electrical measurements.
However, process qualification is required to optimize the flip-chip
assembly.
Flip-Chip
Test Boards
With
an increasing number of I/Os on integrated circuits and accompanying
requirements for high performance, flip-chip type components have
become a compelling technology. NASA will be one of their primary
users, especially in the context of wide extreme temperature ranges.
We have the ability to test boards for die specifications, bump
pitches, and bump counts; both components and test boards are daisy
chained for continuity. Figure 1 shows the optical photographs of
the FB250 and FB500 test boards: High temperature FR4 (Tg = 176
oC) 0.031” thickness, copper conductor, Taiyo PSR-400 solder
mask, FB250 board (10: 250 x 250 mil2 sites, pitch 18 mil, minimum
line 6 mil, and maximum space 12 mil), and FB500 board (10: 500
x 500 mil2 sites, pitch 18 mil, minimum line 6 mil, and maximum
space 12 mil).
Temperature
Profile
Figure
2 shows the temperature profile employed to perform the extreme
temperature thermal cycling of the FB250 and FB500 flip-chip test
boards.
1. Baseline:
at room temperature, 25 oC.
2. TC1 cover
tow ranges:
a. 281 cycles
in a temperature range of (X) -120 oC to +115 oC; Y: ramp rate
of 5 oC/minute.
b. 200 cycles in a temperature range of (X) -120 oC to +85 oC;
Y: ramp rate of 5 oC/minute.
3. TC2 cover
tow ranges: 200 cycles in a temperature range of (X) -55 oC to
+100 oC; Y: ramp rate of 5 oC/minute (mil spec).
4. TC1 cover
tow ranges: 100 cycles in a temperature range of (X) -120 oC to
+85 oC; Y: ramp rate of 40 oC/minute.
Electrical
Tests
The
resistance of the daisy chained FB250 and FB500 test boards (Figure
1) was measured as a function of thermal cycling performed in the
various temperature ranges described above. Figures 3 and 4 show
the experimental test data after thermal cycling. Detailed experimental
data will be presented in the future.
X-ray
Imaging and Surface Acoustic Microscopy
This
work will be performed shortly to identify failures in the flip-chip
interconnects as a function of thermal cycling in an extreme temperature
range. Electrical tests show that there is not significant change
in resistance as a function of thermal cycling.
FB500
Bare
chip inspection: The X-ray image of one chip is shown in Figure
5. Two opposite corners, depicted at the same magnification, show
non-uniform solder bumping.
Solder
wetting after reflow: Kester 6502 tacky flux with a shim of 35mm
thickness was used for this build. The X-ray image of a solder joint
after reflow is shown in Figure 6; this figure represents two opposite
corners at the same magnification, showing different wetting results.
The cross-section images of the two adjacent edges corresponding
to Figure 6(b) are shown in Figure 7.
Underfill:
Parameters for the underfill process are shown in Table 1. The CSAM
images were obtained after underfill cure. One out of 40 chips was
found with voids, which is shown in Figure 8. The middle line pattern
with one-third of the edge length was used for dispensing. The void
occurred close to the opposite edge.
FB250
Solder
wetting after reflow: Kester 6502 tacky flux with a shim of 35mm
thickness was used for this build. The X-ray image of a solder joint
after reflow is shown in Figure 9. The shape of the solder joint
indicates good wetting.
Underfill:
Parameters for the underfill process are shown in Table 2. The CSAM
images were obtained after underfill cure. Four out of 70 chips
were found with voids, which are shown in Figure 10. The middle
line pattern with one-third of the edge length was used for dispensing.
The void occurred close to the opposite edge.
Conclusions
Advanced
packaging technology, such as flip-chip test boards (FB250 and 500),
has been subjected to extreme temperature ranges that cover military
specifications and the extreme Martian environment at various ramp
rates. The greater the number of thermal cycles, the more noticeable
the change in resistance of the daisy chained flip chips. No catastrophic
failures were observed, even after 481 extreme temperature thermal
cycles per electrical measurements. Process qualification is required
to optimize the flip-chip assembly, which is clear from the X-ray
and CSAM studies. X-ray and CSAM studies have not been made as of
yet after thermal cycling and will be done shortly. After extensive
testing for future space applications in the extreme temperature
environments, it may be determined that the flip-chip advanced test
assembly is a robust technology.
Acknowledgements
This
work has been supported by NEPP to assess the reliability of advanced
interconnect and packaging technologies under extreme cold temperatures.
I would like to thank Dr. Reza Ghaffarian for his encouragement
and support.
| Figure
1. Optical photographs of the flip-chip test boards of FB250
and FB500. |
|
|
| Figure
2. Thermal cycle test profile employed for various temperature
ranges of thermal cycling. |
|
| Figure
3. Resistance of the daisy chained flip-chip FB250 test board:
a. Resistance of the pairs at room temperature, b. resistance
of the pairs measured after 481 thermal cycles -120 oC to 115
oC and -120 oC to 85 oC (TC1), c. resistance of the pairs measured
after 200 thermal cycles -55 oC to 100 oC (TC2), and d. resistance
of the pairs measured after 100 thermal cycles -125 oC to 85
oC (TC3). |
 |
| Figure
4. Resistance of the daisy chained flip-chip FB500 test board:
a. Resistance of the pairs at room temperature, b. resistance
of the pairs measured after 481 thermal cycles -120 oC to 115
oC and -120 oC to 85 oC (TC1), and c. resistance of the pairs
measured after 200 thermal cycles -55 oC to 100 oC (TC2). |
|
|
| Figure
5. X-ray image of a bare chip at two opposite corners. |
|
|
(a) |
(b) |
| Figure
6. X-ray image of solder wetting after reflow. |
|
|
Lower
Right Edge |
Upper
Right Edge |
|
|
Middle
of Top Edge |
Right
of Top Edge |
| Figure
7. Cross section of top right corner, viewed from chip side. |
| Underfill |
Stage
temp.
(°C) |
Air
pressure
(psi) |
Needle
gauge |
RPM |
Line
speed (in/sec) |
| RDP-960 |
80 |
6 |
#23 |
250 |
0.08 |
Table 1. Parameters for underfill component FB500.
|
| Figure
8. CSAM image of underfill with void (board 3, die C). |
|
| Figure
9. X-ray image of solder wetting after reflow. |
| Underfill |
Stage
temp.
(°C) |
Air
pressure
(psi) |
Needle
gauge |
RPM |
Line
speed (in/sec) |
| RDP-960 |
100 |
6 |
#23 |
250 |
0.08 |
Table 2. Parameters for underfill component FB250.
|
|
|
|
Board1_D |
Board5_E |
Board7_D |
Board7_F |
Figure
10. CSAM images of underfill with voids. |
|