| PDF
The
Continuing Dangers of Tin Whiskers and Attempts to Control Them
with Conformal Coating
Jay
Brusse
QSS Group, Inc./NASA
Jay.A.Brusse.1@gsfc.nasa.gov
Figure 1. SEM photo of a tin whisker breaking out
from beneath conformal coating (x625)
Abstract:
A 1998 commercial satellite failure caused by tin whisker induced
shorts prompted NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) to issue
a NASA Advisory (NA-044 and NA-044A) (1,2) to remind
the NASA community of the tin whisker phenomenon and the inherent
risks associated with the use of pure tin plated components. Indeed
the NASA Advisory served as a "reminder" since the spontaneous
growth of tin whiskers from some tin plated surfaces has been known
and studied for over 50 years with dozens of technical publications
and several GIDEP Alerts produced during that time. During the 1990s
the US Military modified most (but not all) of their electronic
component specifications to prohibit the use of pure tin finishes
in order to minimize the risks of whiskering. However, as regulations
and a world economy push todays electronics industry to use
environmentally friendly (Pb-free) alternatives, the prevalence
of pure tin plated components is bound to increase potentially increasing
NASA's risk of exposure to risks associated with tin whiskers significantly.
In an effort to evaluate risk mitigation techniques, NASA GSFC
initiated experiments to study the effects of Uralane 5750 (a commonly
used conformal coat) on tin whisker growth. After more than two
years of experimentation, we have found that conformal coat does
not prevent tin whisker formation although it does appear to substantially
reduce the rate of growth. We have observed that a tin whisker has
grown through an area of conformal coat that is approximately 1/4
mil thick (see figure 1). Numerous tin nodules growing beneath a
nominal 2 mil thick coating are also being monitored to determine
if and when they will be able to penetrate this barrier. We have
also observed that tin whiskers can bend in response to forces of
electrostatic attraction; thus increasing the probability of tin
whisker shorts either from two whiskers colliding or from one whisker
bending to contact another conductor. Especially for long duration
missions, use of conformal coat as a sole means of risk mitigation
may not be completely effective. Research is ongoing.
BACKGROUND:
The growth of tin whiskers on pure tin plated electronic components
and associated hardware has been documented for decades. Notable
examples of pure tin plated components that have exhibited tin whisker
formations include electromagnetic relays, transistors, hybrid microcircuit
packages, terminal lugs and very recently ceramic chip capacitors.
A few such examples are shown below in figure 2:
|
|
|
|
Electromagnetic relay terminals
Photo courtesy of NASA GSFC
|
Ceramic chip capacitor termination
Photo courtesy of Ericsson
|
Hybrid microcircuit lid
Photo courtesy of JPL
|
Figure 2. Examples of Tin Whiskers Growing on Pure Tin Plated Electronic
Components
An article was published in the December 1998 edition of the EEE
Links Newsletter that provides a basic overview of the tin whisker
phenomenon and some of the inherent risks.(3) Included
in that article are explanations of the possible effects of tin
whiskers in more conventional earth-based environments. Also, interim
results and a detailed explanation of GSFC experiments were reported
in a September 2000 paper entitled "Effect of Conformal Coat
on Tin Whisker Growth".(4) The authors of this
current article guide interested readers to these two publications
for a simple primer on tin whiskers and details of the GSFC experimental
process as those details will not be repeated here. In addition,
the NASA Goddard Tin Whisker Homepage provides an extensive list
of reference materials on the topic as well as access to our published
paper:
http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker
A 1998 on-orbit commercial satellite failure was reportedly caused
by tin whiskers emanating from the surface of a pure tin plated
relay.(5) Over time the whiskers grew to such a length
that they were capable of short circuiting the spacecraft bus. Laboratory
tests dating back to the early 1990s demonstrated the potential
for a tin whisker short to form a plasma in reduced barometric pressure
environments (vacuum). (6,7) If sufficient energy and
a low impedance path are available from the power source, this plasma
can sustain an arc that is capable of carrying HUNDREDS of AMPERES!
Such a short circuit is reported to have occurred on the commercial
satellite opening protective fuse elements thus rendering the spacecraft
non-operational. Since 1998 it has been reported that two additional
commercial satellites employing a similar bus design have failed
from this same mechanism. (8)
Despite the extensive research performed to date by industry and
academia, an accepted comprehensive description of the growth mechanism(s),
effective risk mitigation practices and industry accepted tin whisker
test methods still elude researchers. It is however, commonly believed
that the whiskers form in order to relieve residual stresses in
the plating that result from internal and/or external stresses.
As such, "bright" tin finishes which have a high residual stress
after plating are more prone to whiskering. Numerous other factors
also affect whiskering propensity such as substrate material, plating
chemistry and process, plating thickness and grain size. The studies
to date have not conclusively demonstrated the relative importance
of these factors nor combinations of these factors and as such a
"proven" whisker-free pure tin plating process that is adaptable
to all types of components is not yet available.
Some studies suggest that alloying as little as 0.9% lead (Pb)
with the tin dramatically reduces the size and growth rate of whiskers
to a low enough level that is safe for current microelectronic geometries.
As such, NASA Advisory NA-044 reports that the most effective risk
mitigation technique against tin whisker induced short circuits
is to prohibit the use of electronic components and associated hardware
that employ pure tin plating as a final surface finish (common practice
is to require a minimum of 3% Pb). The current worldwide initiative
to reduce the use of potentially hazardous materials such as Pb
is driving the electronics industry to consider pure tin plating
as an alternative to tin-lead plating. With respect to factors such
as solderability, ease of manufacture and compatibility with existing
assembly methods pure tin plating is a viable alternative. However,
the current lack of an industry accepted understanding of tin whisker
growth factors and/or test methods to identify whisker-prone products
makes a blanket acceptance of pure tin plating a risky proposition
for high reliability systems.
Knowing that simple prohibition of pure tin plating will become
more and more difficult, NASA GSFC decided to conduct experiments
to study the effectiveness of other tin whisker risk mitigation
techniques. Several mitigation approaches have been suggested in
the past including annealing or reflowing the plated surface with
high temperature to relax internal stresses, covering solderable
surfaces with a Pb-containing solder or coating the surface with
a protective barrier of conformal coat. All of these practices have
benefits and limitations. The conformal coat approach seemed to
be the most practical and least invasive technique for high reliability
systems. GSFC review of the available literature found limited information
related to the benefits of conformal coating as a risk mitigation
technique. Therefore, in December 1998 NASA GSFC began experiments
to evaluate the effectiveness of using conformal coat to mitigate
the risk of tin whisker growth.
Experimental Approach:
The objective of the GSFC experiments was to determine if conformal
coat could be used as an effective risk mitigator, when whisker-prone
(or unknown whisker propensity) components are used in electronic
systems. Uralane 5750 was selected as the conformal coat material
for these experiments because of its common use in NASA flight hardware.
Experiments were devised to evaluate the effectiveness of Uralane
5750 at:
- Delaying the onset of tin whisker formation (incubation
period)
- Affecting the growth rate of tin whiskers
- Affecting the growth density of tin whiskers
- Preventing tin whiskers from growing through the coating
As such, for the purpose of these experiments, test specimens with
extremely high propensity to form tin whiskers were intentionally
produced, so that the effects of the coating on whiskering could
be observed and documented. A literature search found that brass
substrates with "bright" tin electroplate of approximately
200 microinches were highly prone to whisker formation. The specimens
for our experiments were procured from a commercial plating shop.
- Substrate Material: Brass Type 260 (test coupons
were 4" x 1" x 0.032")
- Underplate: 50% of samples have a copper strike and
copper plate to 0.0001" min
50% of samples have NO underplate (i.e., tin plate direct on brass)
- Plating Process: "Bright" tin bath
- Tin Plate Thickness: 200 ± 50 microinches
To further promote whisker formation, portions of the test specimens
were intentionally scratched using a knife blade. Such surface defects
are reported to create localized stresses in the plating that may
promote whisker formation. Samples were then coated over half their
surface using Uralane 5750 to a nominal thickness of 2 mils; the
other half was left uncoated as a control. Seven (7) samples were
stored under ambient laboratory conditions (approximately 22°C and
30% to 70% relative humidity) while eight (8) samples were stored
at 50°C which our literature review found to be commonly reported
as the optimal temperature for whisker formation.
Experimental Results/Observations After 2 ½ Years:
For the last 2 ½ years the test specimens have been examined periodically,
using both optical techniques and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Incubation Period and Whisker Density:
Our experiments to date have shown that Uralane 5750 conformal
coat applied over top of whisker-prone test specimens does NOT PREVENT
the formation of tin whiskers. Tin nodules initiated within one
month of plating on both the conformal coated and non-coated specimens.
Interestingly, after 4 months, the density of the nodules was 4
to 5 times higher on the coated side compared to the non-coated
side. However, one year after the initiation of the experiment the
density of whisker formations was found to be approximately equal
on both coated and non-coated specimens. It was hypothesized that
the rapid formation of tin oxide on the non-coated side increases
the incubation period for whisker formation. This hypothesis has
not been tested.
Figure 3 shows the formation of tin nodules beneath the conformal
coat on several specimens. Such growths under the conformal coating
are common on all of the specimens regardless of storage conditions
(room temperature vs. 50°C). In these SEM images the tin whiskers
resemble a spike being pushed into a rubber membrane, deforming
the surface into a sharp-tipped cone. It is interesting to observe
that many of the whiskers in Figure 3 formed along a surface scratch
or defect in the substrate that was NOT intentionally introduced.
These minor defects were most likely present on the substrate prior
to plating or were introduced through the handling of the specimens
just prior to initiation of the experiments. This observation raises
the concern that basic handling during manufacturing or user assembly
may impart stresses to the plating surface which become nucleation
sites for whisker growths.
|
|
 |
|
|
10X magnification
|
43X magnification
|
670X magnification
|
Figure 3. SEM photos of tin domes forming beneath conformal coating
Whisker Growth Rate:
The application of conformal coat appears to retard the rate of
whisker growth compared to an uncoated surface. The longest whisker
observed on these specimens on the non-coated side is on the order
of 2 mm, whereas those whiskers growing beneath the conformal coat
are on the order of 0.05 mm (at present). Still unknown is whether
the rate of growth will increase once the whisker has broken through
the coating material. The average growth rate of the needle-like
whiskers on the non-conformally coated areas is about 0.13 mm/year.
The fastest growth rate from these specimens is approximately 0.80
mm/year.
Whisker Penetration of Conformal Coating:
Figure 1 shows the most extreme observation we have recorded to
date where a tin whisker has actually grown through the conformal
coating approximately 2 years after application of the conformal
coat. Attempts to measure the actual thickness of the coating at
this location have been difficult because this area of the test
specimen has a relatively thin layer of conformal coat. Estimates
of the coating thickness in this location are on the order of 1/4
mil. After emerging from the coating, the tin whisker can become
a risk for inducing short circuits. As noted previously, there are
numerous other whisker growths beneath the thicker areas of conformal
coating (~ 2 mil thick) that we anticipate will eventually penetrate
the conformal coating. With some NASA missions extending over 10
years, and a few to 20 years, it is possible (but not confirmed
experimentally) that coatings even as thick as 10 mils may not prevent
whiskers from protruding.
Future inspections will continue to look for more whiskers penetrating
the coating and if possible, experiments may be conducted to examine
the effect of the conformal coating at quenching an arc formed by
a whisker induced short circuit under reduced barometric pressure
conditions (vacuum).
Demonstration of Whisker Deflection due to Electrostatic Attraction:
Theoretical calculations predict that a whisker that emerges from
a coated surface and then comes in contact with a 2nd
coated surface will buckle before being able to penetrate that surface.(1)
However, short circuits caused by tin whiskers growing outward through
a conformal coating are still a real risk. Suppose
two whiskers emerge from beneath separate conformally coated surfaces
at different electrical potentials. The electrostatic force
generated by the potential difference between the whiskers will
attract them towards each other thus significantly increasing the
likelihood of the whiskers shorting together. Figure 4 shows
tin whisker growing from a mounting tab of a pure tin plated relay.
In this GSFC experiment, the mounting tab (and thus the tin whisker)
was electrically grounded. A test probe (used to simulate a 2nd
whisker) was brought into close proximity (~ 1 mm) of the whisker,
but situated such that physical shorting was not possible. The test
probe was then placed at 50 V relative to the whisker. As can be
seen from this enhanced photo, the tin whisker bends as a result
of electrostatic force generated by the potential difference between
the whisker and the test probe. After removal of the test potential,
the whisker bends back to its original position. This experiment
was repeated hundreds of times without causing the whisker to break.
Further experiments to study this behavior are planned.
|
|
|
Figure 4. Optical photo of tin whisker movement due to electrostatic
attraction
(Note: Photo has been graphically enhanced to aid in observation
of the thin whisker)
Effects of Storage Temperature:
Contrary to other studies on tin whisker formation, GSFC observed
higher density of whisker growth on samples stored under room ambient
conditions (approx. 22°C, 30%-70% RH) than on samples stored at
50°C. This is not at all unusual in the study of whiskers - experimenters
often find conflicting results, suggesting there is some underlying
factor or factors that are not recognized and are not being controlled.
This situation makes it particularly difficult for us to have confidence
in claims by commercial interests that they have developed whisker-free
coatings, especially given the great variability in incubation time
that is also reported in this literature. Table 1 provides a comparison
of the whisker density and typical length after 2 years versus storage
conditions and substrate preparation. These comparisons were made
for whisker formations from non-conformal coated sides only.
Table 1. Whisker density and length comparison between
the specimen stored at 25 °C and 50 °C after 2 years.
(Non-Coated Specimens)
|
Stored at 50 °C
|
|
Specimen without Cu flash
|
Specimen with Cu flash
|
|
S/N
|
Average density (whiskers/mm2)
|
Typical whisker length for needle-like whiskers (um)
|
S/N
|
Average density (whiskers/mm2)
|
Typical whisker length for needle-like whiskers (um)
|
|
1T
|
18
|
20
|
1C
|
6
|
20
|
|
2T
|
18
|
20
|
2C
|
6
|
20
|
|
3T
|
18
|
20
|
3C
|
17
|
200
|
|
4T
|
18
|
20
|
4C
|
7
|
280
|
|
Stored at room ambient conditions
|
|
Specimen without Cu flash
|
Specimen with Cu flash
|
|
S/N
|
Average density (whiskers/mm2)
|
Typical whisker length for needle-like whiskers (um)
|
S/N
|
Average density (whiskers/mm2)
|
Typical whisker length for needle-like whiskers (um)
|
|
5T
|
50
|
900
|
5C
|
26
|
250
|
|
6T
|
50
|
900
|
6C
|
32
|
138
|
| |
|
|
7C
|
32
|
132
|
As shown in Table 1, the density of the whiskers on samples stored
at room temperature is two to three times higher than for those
stored at 50°C. This observation is independent of the presence
of a copper flash intermediate layer between the brass substrate
and the tin plating. In general, the whiskers are also much longer
on specimens stored at room temperature. This finding contradicts
observations reported by other experimenters. The longest whisker
we have observed to date is about 2 mm long after just over 2 years
Some photographs documenting growth behaviors of tin whiskers on
non-conformally coated specimens are shown in Figure 5.
|
|
|
|
A. Typical needle-like whisker (x230)
|
B. Tip of a whisker shown in A. (x3200)
|
|
|
|
|
C. Base of whisker shown in A (x4220)
|
D. Kinked area of a whisker (x6500)
|
|
|
|
|
E. Typical straight whisker (x450)
|
F. Thinning of a whisker (x2200)
|
Figure 5. Various tin whisker formations observed in GSFC experiments
Conclusions
Catastrophic failures of electronic systems caused by tin whisker
induced short circuits have been reported in commercial satellite
applications. Despite decades of research into the tin whisker phenomenon,
a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms that affect their
growth is not available. Currently, there are no industry accepted
test methods for determining a particular components (or plating
processs) propensity to form tin whiskers. Some experimenters
report the incubation time before initiation of whisker growth can
be months, if not years. These observations are particularly concerning
for long duration missions.
Historically, various forms of pure tin plating (especially, "bright"
tin plating) have been found to be prone to tin whisker formation.
Currently, the most effective risk mitigation technique against
tin whiskers is to avoid the use of components that are most prone
to whiskering of the form that is large enough to pose a reliability
hazard. In the event such usage cannot be avoided or confirmed,
users are advised to carefully review the use of pure tin plated
components against application conditions, circuit geometries and
mission objectives.
NASA GSFC is evaluating the effects of Uralane 5750 on tin whisker
formation. Experimental observations and data are summarized below:
- Uralane 5750 does not prevent whisker formation
- Uralane 5750 shortens the incubation period of whisker formation
- Although, whiskers initiate more rapidly under Uralane 5750,
the coating also retards the growth rate of whiskers
- Whiskers are capable of growing out from beneath a 1/4 mil thick
Uralane 5750 coating
- Tin whiskers can bend under forces of electrostatic attraction,
thus increasing the probability of shorting
NASA GSFC is continuing this evaluation and plans to perform periodic
inspections of the test specimens to further document the effectiveness
of the conformal coat against tin whisker induced problems. In addition,
GSFC is planning to evaluate some of the following issues:
- Tin whisker growth from pure tin plated capacitor terminations
- Tin whisker growth from pure tin plated leads of Plastic Encapsulated
Microcircuits (PEMs)
- Tin whisker growth from pure tin plated shell of connectors
- Tin whisker growth from Tin/Lead finished components
- Evaluation of conditions that may accelerate tin whisker growth
in conjunction with an industry task group trying to develop test
methods to quantify whisker propensity of various plating chemistries.
This work is being done under the guidance of Dr. Henning Leidecker
and Mike Sampson at NASA GSFC.
References:
- NASA Advisory NA-044: "Tin Whiskers", October 23, 1998.
- NASA Advisory NA-044A: "Tin Whiskers", December 17, 1998
- J. Brusse, "Tin Whiskers: Revisiting an Old Problem",
EEE Links, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 5 7, December 1998.
- H. Leidecker, and J.S. Kadesch, "Effects of Uralane Conformal
Coating on Tin Whisker Growth", Proceedings of IMAPS Nordic, The
37th IMAPS Nordic Annual Conference, pp. 108-116, September, 10-13,
2000.
- Boeing Satellite Systems (formerly known as "Hughes Space")
Website: http://www.hughespace.com/hsc_pressreleases/98_08_11_601ok.html
- D.H. Van Westerhuyzen, P.G. Backes, J.F. Linder, S.C. Merrell
and R.L. Poeschel, "Tin Whisker Induced Failure in Vacuum," 18th
International Symposium for Testing & Failure Analysis, pp.407
- 412, October 17, 1992.
- J.H. Richardson, and B.R. Lasley, "Tin Whisker Initiated Vacuum
Metal Arcing in Spacecraft Electronics," 1992 Government Microcircuit
Applications Conference, Vol. XVIII, pp. 119 - 122, November 10
- 12, 1992.
- Satellite Outages and Failure Website:
http://sat-nd.com/failures/hs601.html
|