Manufacturer
|
Question 1
Has pure tin
plating ever been used on Military Spec. parts?
|
Question 2
What kind of
plating is used currently?
|
Question 3
Is pure tin
used for commercial product?
|
Question 4
Does the manufacturer
report any field experience with tin whiskers?
|
GSFC
EDAX Evaluation
Examination
of Residual Parts at GSFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Babcock
|
No
pure tin for last 10 years |
~4%
Lead (Pb) added to Tin (Sn) |
No. |
None
known. |
No
samples evaluated. |
Communications
Instruments, Inc.
(CII)
|
No
pure tin for last 15 to 20 years |
~5%
Lead (Pb) added to Tin (Sn) |
No.
Same process for Military and commercial. |
None
known for at least 15 years. |
No
samples evaluated. |
Deutsch |
So
far unable to locate information |
So
far unable to locate information |
So
far unable to locate information |
So
far unable to locate information |
No
samples evaluated. |
Electronic
Specialty Corp.
(ESC)
|
No
pure tin since the 1980’s when pure tin was prohibited |
~5%
Lead (Pb) added to Tin (Sn) |
Yes.
External only. |
None
reported, but the manufacturer is aware of tin whisker phenomenon. |
No
samples evaluated. |
Genicom
(acquired by CII in Dec. 1997)
|
No
pure tin for last 15 to 20 years |
Eutectic
Tin/Lead (Sn/Pb) |
No.
Same process for Military and Commercial |
No
problems since POC joined company. |
2
part lots tested. Tin Alloys were used on both: |
Hartman |
Yes.
Pure tin was used internally only |
Typical
plating materials are Nickel (Ni) and Silver (Ag) |
Yes.
Same process for Military and Commercial. Tin plating per MIL-T-10727 |
No. |
1
part lot tested. Tin alloy used. |
Hi-G
Corp. |
No
pure tin for last 25 to 30 years |
60/40
Tin/Lead (Sn/Pb) |
No. |
No
tin whisker problems, but point of contact is aware of phenomenon. |
No
samples evaluated |
Leach
Corp.
|
Pure
tin was used until 11/97 |
3%
to 10% Lead (Pb) added to Tin (Sn) |
No. |
Yes. |
15
part lots evaluated. 8 with LDCs ranging from 7920 to 9332 use pure
tin including some S311 parts. The other 7 lots use Nickel, Nickel/Tin
or Tin-Lead (LDCs from 9421 to 9832). Note: Leach has informed GSFC
that pure tin was commonly used on product manufactured until 11/97. |
Magnecraft/
Struthers-Dunn
(MSD)
|
Magnecraft
purchased Struthers Dunn in 1995. Prior to the merger, Struthers Dunn
product used pure tin plating on MIL-R-6106 relays. The combined company
(MSD) does not use pure tin. |
Current
MSD product uses ~7% Lead (Pb) added to Tin (Sn). Some Zinc (Zn) and
Nickel (Ni) plated product is also offered. |
No.
Most product is Tin/Lead plated. |
Yes.
When Struthers Dunn was a separate company from MSD, they observed
some rare occurrences of tin whiskers. |
1
Struthers Dunn part lot M6106/50-006 with LDC 9309 has pure tin.
This part pre-dates
Magnecraft buyout of Struthers Dunn and is strictly a Struthers
Dunn product.
|
Potter
& Brumfield (Siemens) |
No
more military products being built. |
Some
products use 80/20 or 78/22 Tin/Lead |
Yes,
pure tin is still used on some terminal sockets. |
Yes,
about 20 years ago, some relay types were scrapped due to tin whiskers.
And of course, GIDEP Problem Advisory F3-P-97-01 was issued in 1996
covering whisker problems with P & B relays. |
No
samples evaluated. |
Teledyne
|
Teledyne
has never used pure tin |
N/A |
No. |
No. |
No
samples evaluated. |