%PDF-1.6
%âãÏÓ
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
application/pdf
Mobryan
Key Proton Test Findings for Sensor Technologies Evaluated in FY03
Sensor Technologies Evaluated in FY03
CIDTEC 818
HgCdTe Hybrid at >11 mm
HST Wide Field Camera 3 E2V Charge Coupled Device (CCD)
HST Wide Field Camera 3 1.7 mm Rockwell HgCdTe FPA
Proton Response of James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) MWIR Hybrids
FY03
Proton test results
2003-12-23T12:49:18Z
Microsoft Word
2011-07-05T10:50:43-04:00
2011-07-05T10:50:43-04:00
Acrobat PDFWriter 4.05 for Windows NT
CIDTEC 818, HgCdTe Hybrid at >11 mm, HST Wide Field Camera 3 E2V Charge Coupled Device (CCD), HST Wide Field Camera 3 1.7 mm Rockwell HgCdTe FPA, Proton Response of James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) MWIR Hybrids, FY03, Proton test results
uuid:088b2614-0741-4b71-a4f3-2a7bf6a59643
uuid:4d7f1f61-6062-4b73-b018-7e65193a17eb
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
4 0 obj
<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>stream
BT
126 709.5 TD
0 0 0 rg
/F1 12 Tf
-0.081 Tc 0 Tw (krad) Tj
21 0 TD -0.246 Tc (\() Tj
3.75 0 TD -0.0333 Tc 1.0333 Tw (Si\) dose level. However a substantial difference in the inherent hardness of) Tj
-24.75 -14.25 TD -0.069 Tc 0.444 Tw (the two ) Tj
39.75 0 TD -0.0332 Tc 1.1582 Tw (ROICs was observed, with the Rockwell readout showing an offset shift) Tj
-39.75 -13.5 TD -0.0555 Tc 0.243 Tw (with dose that was more than 40 times that of the Raytheon part.) Tj
0 -27.75 TD -0.0165 Tc 1.3499 Tw (For more information, please see \223Radiation environment performance of JWST) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.1107 Tc 0.1107 Tw (prototype ) Tj
49.5 0 TD 0.0246 Tc 0.7254 Tw (FPAs,\224 M.E. ) Tj
68.25 0 TD 0.0208 Tc 0.7292 Tw (McKelvey, K.A. ) Tj
87 0 TD -0.0703 Tc 2.6953 Tw (Ennico, R.R. Johnson, P.W. Marshall,) Tj
-204.75 -14.25 TD -0.0591 Tc 0.2466 Tw (R.E. McMurray, Jr., C.R. ) Tj
124.5 0 TD -0.012 Tc 0.387 Tw (McCreight, J.C. ) Tj
81 0 TD -0.0872 Tc 1.0247 Tw (Pickel, and R.A. Reed, ) Tj
116.25 0 TD -0.0448 Tc 0.7948 Tw (to be published) Tj
-321.75 -13.5 TD -0.158 Tc 1.158 Tw (in the SPIE ) Tj
61.5 0 TD 0.007 Tc 2.7429 Tw (Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation) Tj
228 0 TD -0.018 Tc 2.268 Tw ( Proceedings, August) Tj
-289.5 -14.25 TD -0.047 Tc 1.9508 Tw (2003. The impact of secondary production on proton testing is discussed in J.) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.1071 Tc 0.1071 Tw (Pickel, ) Tj
37.5 0 TD -0.092 Tc 0.092 Tw (R.A.Reed, ) Tj
54 0 TD 0.0069 Tc -0.0069 Tw (P.W.Marshall, ) Tj
75.75 0 TD -0.0447 Tc 0.0447 Tw (T.M.Jordan, ) Tj
63.75 0 TD -0.039 Tc 0.039 Tw (G.Gee, ) Tj
39.75 0 TD -0.084 Tc 0.084 Tw (B.Fodness, ) Tj
58.5 0 TD -0.12 Tc 0 Tw (M.McKelvey,) Tj
-329.25 -13.5 TD -0.0438 Tc 0.0438 Tw (R.E.McMurray, ) Tj
82.5 0 TD -0.0295 Tc 0.0295 Tw (K.A.Ennico, ) Tj
67.5 0 TD -0.048 Tc 3.798 Tw (R.R.Johnson and) Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
92.25 0 TD -0.0178 Tc 5.2678 Tw (C.McCreight, \223Proton-Induced) Tj
-242.25 -14.25 TD -0.0502 Tc 5.5814 Tw (Secondary Particle Environment for Space-Based Infrared Sensors\224, to be) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0411 Tc 1.6661 Tw (published in the Dec. 2003 IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. For further) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0293 Tc 1.3043 Tw (information about the transient response of the JWST prototype detectors please) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0617 Tc 0.4367 Tw (contact Robert Reed at robert.a.reed@gsfc.nasa.gov.) Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
2 0 obj
[/PDF/Text]
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>stream
BT
90 695.25 TD
0 0 0 rg
/F1 12 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw (5. ) Tj
18 0 TD -0.0435 Tc 0.2102 Tw (Proton Response of James Webb Space Telescope \(JWST\) MWIR Hybrids) Tj
ET
108 693 359.25 0.75 re f
BT
126 667.5 TD
-0.1 Tc 0.1 Tw (Both the Raytheon ) Tj
92.25 0 TD -0.023 Tc 0.1302 Tw (InSb detector \(30 K\) and the Rockwell ) Tj
189.75 0 TD 0.02 Tc 0.23 Tw (HgCdTe detector \(37 K) Tj
-282 -13.5 TD -0.207 Tc 0.207 Tw (and 5 ) Tj
28.5 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.162 Tc 0 Tw (m) Tj
7.5 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.0839 Tc 0.5839 Tw (m cutoff\) were all engineering grade prototypes.) Tj
-36 -28.5 TD -0.0574 Tc 3.3074 Tw (The Raytheon SB291 readout) Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
157.5 0 TD -0.0647 Tc 3.279 Tw (multiplexor is a 1024 x 1024 element source-) Tj
-157.5 -13.5 TD -0.0343 Tc 0.6593 Tw (follower-per-detector \(SFD\) design formed on an ) Tj
243.75 0 TD -0.0475 Tc 0.9475 Tw (epitaxially grown layer on a ) Tj
142.5 0 TD 0.996 Tc 0 Tw (Si) Tj
-386.25 -14.25 TD -0.087 Tc 0.837 Tw (substrate. It has a 25 ) Tj
108 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.162 Tc 0 Tw (m) Tj
7.5 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.017 Tc 1.367 Tw (m pixel and includes a column of reference unit cells on) Tj
-115.5 -14.25 TD -0.0784 Tc 0.8753 Tw (either side of the readout that serve to provide a \221black level\222 that may be used to) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0581 Tc 0.5081 Tw (subtract offset drifts in long-integration measurements.) Tj
0 -27.75 TD -0.0565 Tc 4.7611 Tw (The Rockwell H-1RG readout multiplexer is also an SFD design with an) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0626 Tc 1.3896 Tw (addressable area of 1024 x 1024 including a four pixel wide border of reference) Tj
T* -0.117 Tc 1.617 Tw (pixels. As with the Raytheon ROIC, input and output lines are restricted to one) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.2291 Tc 0.8291 Tw (edge to make it three ) Tj
102.75 0 TD 0.042 Tc -0.042 Tw (side ) Tj
22.5 0 TD -0.0704 Tc 0.4037 Tw (buttable. An H-2RG \(2048 x 2048\) was also tested.) Tj
-125.25 -27.75 TD -0.0044 Tc 2.7794 Tw (Overall transient responses are similar at Sensor Chip Assembly \(SCA\) level) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0488 Tc 4.3988 Tw (though Rockwell SCA hits are slightly larger \(apparently due to detector\).) Tj
T* -0.0522 Tc 1.1147 Tw (ReadOut IC \(ROIC\) hits are larger for SB291 than H1RG whereas H1RG proton) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0157 Tc 0.0991 Tw (crosstalk is significantly worse \(probably related to smaller pixel pitch\).) Tj
0 -27.75 TD -0.0629 Tc 0.7593 Tw (The dark current response is emphasized since it is likely to be the parameter that) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0165 Tc 0.3915 Tw (limits instrument sensitivity. These detectors had exceptional dark currents which) Tj
T* -0.0202 Tc 1.0202 Tw (made them a challenge to evaluate. Baseline pre-irradiation dark currents are on) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.048 Tc 1.548 Tw (the order of ) Tj
66.75 0 TD -0.0686 Tc 3.6044 Tw (millielectrons per second, necessitating very long integrations in) Tj
-66.75 -13.5 TD -0.025 Tc 0.025 Tw (\221perfectly\222 dark cryostats. ) Tj
129.75 0 TD -0.0054 Tc 0.7554 Tw (Data artifacts due to amplifier drifts, terrestrial cosmic) Tj
-129.75 -14.25 TD -0.0739 Tc 3.6875 Tw (ray hits, and \(after irradiation\) induced radioactivity in the cryostat must be) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0433 Tc 0.6058 Tw (accurately subtracted. The ) Tj
134.25 0 TD -0.0119 Tc 1.7619 Tw (dewar was carefully designed to minimize activation) Tj
-134.25 -13.5 TD -0.0072 Tc 5.1072 Tw (during proton exposures, and also had the capability to assess secondary) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0679 Tc 0.3179 Tw (production as described in the references below.) Tj
0 -27.75 TD -0.095 Tc 0.095 Tw (After 5 ) Tj
36.75 0 TD -0.081 Tc 0 Tw (krad) Tj
21.75 0 TD -0.246 Tc (\() Tj
3.75 0 TD -0.0829 Tc 0.2704 Tw (Si\) exposure with 63 ) Tj
102.75 0 TD -0.0535 Tc 1.0535 Tw (MeV protons, both the Raytheon and Rockwell) Tj
-165 -13.5 TD -0.0508 Tc 2.3585 Tw (devices lost about 10% of pixels, with this percentage of hot pixels not being) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0379 Tc 0.8504 Tw (strongly dependent on threshold levels over a reasonable range. To be counted as) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.1 Tc 1.0844 Tw (a hot pixel, it had to fall below a very tight threshold every time it was measured) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0881 Tc 0.8381 Tw (prior to irradiation, and then exceed a larger 6 ) Tj
227.25 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
0.264 Tc 0 Tw (s) Tj
7.5 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.0739 Tc 1.0739 Tw ( threshold value at least 11 times) Tj
-234.75 -15 TD -0.0582 Tc 1.7457 Tw (out of 13 measurements after irradiation exposure. This degree of dark current) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0495 Tc 0.7995 Tw (activation is within a factor of two of the JWST NIR operability requirements. It) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0514 Tc 0.6943 Tw (is important to note that the accelerator deposits the dose over a very short period) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0968 Tc 0.5468 Tw (of time as compared to the on-orbit case, and that annealing in the later case might) Tj
T* -0.0376 Tc 0.2251 Tw (make the difference between meeting the requirement or not.) Tj
0 -27.75 TD -0.052 Tc 3.8854 Tw (Most other performance parameters \(e.g. read noise, amplifier linearity, and) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0493 Tc 0.1743 Tw (power dissipation\) were unchanged after 5 ) Tj
206.25 0 TD 0.1065 Tc 0 Tw (krad) Tj
21.75 0 TD -0.246 Tc (\() Tj
3.75 0 TD -0.0269 Tc 0.9269 Tw (Si\). These parameters are largely) Tj
-231.75 -13.5 TD -0.0356 Tc 0.9731 Tw (dependent on the readout operation which was not significantly affected by the 5) Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
14 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
90 708.75 TD
0 0 0 rg
/F1 12 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw (4. ) Tj
18 0 TD -0.0183 Tc 0.0183 Tw (HST Wide Field Camera 3 1.7 ) Tj
149.25 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.162 Tc 0 Tw (m) Tj
7.5 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.148 Tc 0.523 Tw (m Rockwell ) Tj
60.75 0 TD 0.046 Tc -0.046 Tw (HgCdTe FPA) Tj
ET
108 706.5 282.75 0.75 re f
BT
126 680.25 TD
-0.0776 Tc 1.661 Tw (The Rockwell 1024 x 1024 detector is a 1.7 ) Tj
226.5 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.162 Tc 0 Tw (m) Tj
7.5 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.0703 Tc 1.1953 Tw (m cutoff ) Tj
48 0 TD 0.1087 Tc 2.1413 Tw (HgCdTe sensor with a) Tj
-282 -14.25 TD -0.0369 Tc 6.0369 Tw (molecular beam) Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
91.5 0 TD -0.0671 Tc 6.8171 Tw (epitaxially grown) Tj
0 Tc -0.75 Tw ( ) Tj
99 0 TD -0.0587 Tc 6.6212 Tw (CdZnTe substrate hybridized to a) Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
195 0 TD 0.996 Tc (Si) Tj
-385.5 -13.5 TD -0.0861 Tc 1.0861 Tw (multiplexer. The readout circuit is divided into four independent quadrants. The) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0811 Tc 1.3132 Tw (format of the device is 1024 x 1024 with five rows and five columns configured) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0414 Tc 4.3539 Tw (as reference pixels. The reference pixels are used to correct for baseline) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0806 Tc 0.2949 Tw (instabilities. The pixel size is 18 ) Tj
160.5 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.162 Tc 0 Tw (m) Tj
7.5 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.1007 Tc 0.1007 Tw (m squared.) Tj
-168 -28.5 TD -0.0271 Tc 3.8842 Tw (Pre-irradiation characterization included measurements of the detector\222s dark) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0171 Tc 0.1671 Tw (current, dark current stability, and ) Tj
168 0 TD -0.0613 Tc 0.8113 Tw (noise in the radiation test ) Tj
126.75 0 TD -0.0611 Tc 0.8111 Tw (dewar. Dark current) Tj
-294.75 -13.5 TD -0.0442 Tc 1.4288 Tw (was typically measured by sampling up the ramp for a 30 minute exposure with) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0372 Tc 0.6872 Tw (16 frames. The dark current was 0.12 e-/s including a thermal leak of ~0.05 e-/s.) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0786 Tc 0.2929 Tw (The device underwent a series of 63 ) Tj
175.5 0 TD -0.078 Tc 1.078 Tw (MeV exposures while actively running in the) Tj
-175.5 -14.25 TD -0.0536 Tc 4.5536 Tw (dewar at 150 K. The) Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
130.5 0 TD -0.0275 Tc 5.4275 Tw (dewar was designed to minimized proton-induced) Tj
-130.5 -13.5 TD -0.1435 Tc 0 Tw (activation.) Tj
0 -27.75 TD -0.0101 Tc 1.5782 Tw (Single event transient measurements were acquired. On average, about 30% of) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0499 Tc 1.2285 Tw (the signal charge diffused from the central pixel to the closet neighbors. This is) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.031 Tc 1.3579 Tw (not unexpected given the small pixel size and the random position of the proton) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0605 Tc 0.2855 Tw (hits with in the pixel. No significant persistence was noted.) Tj
0 -27.75 TD -0.0324 Tc 0.6671 Tw (No permanent effects on the WFC3 detectors were observed for the one month, 1) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0835 Tc 1.1796 Tw (year or 5 year equivalent total exposure levels \(the later being 5 x 10) Tj
339 5.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf
0.375 Tc 0 Tw (9) Tj
4.5 -5.25 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.207 Tc 0.957 Tw ( cm) Tj
17.25 5.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf
0.3139 Tc 0 Tw (-2) Tj
7.5 -5.25 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.1035 Tc 0.8535 Tw ( at 63) Tj
-368.25 -14.25 TD -0.0711 Tc 2.7983 Tw (MeV\). A temporary increase in dark current was observed after intermediate) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.057 Tc 0.657 Tw (exposures and began to decay which held at 150 K. Warming the detector to 190) Tj
T* -0.0646 Tc 1.3338 Tw (K reduced dark currents further. Other radiation effects such as increases in the) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0017 Tc 1.0926 Tw (hot pixel population and bias instabilities were temporary and also decayed with) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.083 Tc 0.5651 Tw (time and temperature. The bias level drift was tracked by the reference pixels and) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.077 Tc 4.452 Tw (corrections can be made using these pixels. This should allow for useful) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.031 Tc 0.156 Tw (operation of the device even in the presence of a radiation-induced bias shift.) Tj
0 -27.75 TD -0.0475 Tc 0.593 Tw (Given that the fluence increments occur over time scales significantly shorter than) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0159 Tc 1.7887 Tw (would be experienced on orbit, the observed effects should be greatly reduced.) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0828 Tc 2.3905 Tw (Also, the IR instrument will periodically be warmed up to ~190 K which will) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0498 Tc 4.5498 Tw (accelerate the annealing process. In an unlikely worse case scenario, the) Tj
T* -0.0823 Tc 0.499 Tw (instrument can be commanded to warm up to room temperature.) Tj
0 -27.75 TD -0.0963 Tc 3.3463 Tw (For more details, see) Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
114 0 TD -0.0515 Tc 3.989 Tw ( \223Radiation effects in WFC3 IR Detectors,\224 Scott D.) Tj
-114 -14.25 TD -0.1357 Tc 0.1357 Tw (Johnson, ) Tj
51 0 TD 0.0728 Tc 0 Tw (Augustyn) Tj
46.5 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj
9 0 TD 0.076 Tc (Waczynski) Tj
53.25 0 TD -0.0574 Tc 7.3074 Tw (, Paul Marshall, Elizabeth) Tj
0 Tc -0.75 Tw ( ) Tj
154.5 0 TD 0.2254 Tc 0 Tw (Polidan) Tj
36.75 0 TD 0.048 Tc 6.702 Tw (, Cheryl) Tj
-351 -13.5 TD -0.0906 Tc 3.2156 Tw (Marshall, Robert Reed, Randy A. Kimble, Gregory) Tj
0 Tc -0.75 Tw ( ) Tj
267.75 0 TD -0.3945 Tc 0 Tw (Delo) Tj
22.5 0 TD -0.0597 Tc 3.4347 Tw (, David Schlossberg,) Tj
-290.25 -13.5 TD -0.0944 Tc 1.1444 Tw (Anne Marie Russell, Terry Beck, ) Tj
167.25 0 TD 0.013 Tc 0 Tw (Yiting) Tj
30 0 TD -0.0405 Tc 1.0405 Tw ( Wen, John ) Tj
62.25 0 TD 0.1266 Tc 0 Tw (Yagelowich) Tj
57.75 0 TD -0.0896 Tc 2.0896 Tw (, Robert J. Hill,) Tj
-317.25 -14.25 TD -0.0923 Tc 0.0923 Tw (Edward J. ) Tj
50.25 0 TD 0.0369 Tc 0 Tw (Wassell) Tj
38.25 0 TD -0.0654 Tc 0.5904 Tw (, and Edward Cheng, to be published in the SPIE ) Tj
243 0 TD 0.056 Tc 0 Tw (Astronomical) Tj
-331.5 -13.5 TD 0.0129 Tc 0.3621 Tw (Telescopes and Instrumentation) Tj
152.25 0 TD -0.0141 Tc 0.0141 Tw ( Proceedings, August 2003.) Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
20 0 obj
<>stream
BT
126 708.75 TD
0 0 0 rg
/F1 12 Tf
-0.0487 Tc 1.3612 Tw (measurements were made as a function of time and temperature from -83 ) Tj
369 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.3 Tc 0 Tw (\260) Tj
5.25 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.03 Tc 1.53 Tw (C to) Tj
-374.25 -14.25 TD -0.006 Tc 0 Tw (+30) Tj
18.75 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.3 Tc (\260) Tj
5.25 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.0543 Tc 0.2418 Tw (C. Only data from each temperature extreme has been analyzed to date.) Tj
-24 -28.5 TD 0.0036 Tc 0.6887 Tw (The primary purpose of the study was to evaluate the formation and annealing of) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0745 Tc 2.9014 Tw (\221hot pixels\222. Several instruments on board the HST have lost ~10% of their) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0532 Tc 1.3032 Tw (observing time as a consequence of ) Tj
182.25 0 TD -0.0618 Tc 2.0118 Tw (monthy anneals to ambient temperatures in) Tj
-182.25 -13.5 TD -0.0662 Tc 0.488 Tw (order to anneal hot pixels. It is very important to define \221hot pixel\222 precisely. For) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0835 Tc 1.5002 Tw (example, HST Advanced Camera for Surveys \(ACS\) reported a ) Tj
318.75 0 TD 0.0148 Tc 2.2352 Tw (prelaunch mean) Tj
-318.75 -13.5 TD 0.0307 Tc 0.4693 Tw (dark current of 9.25 +/- 1.02 e) Tj
147.75 5.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf
0.2527 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj
3 -5.25 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.1082 Tc 1.1582 Tw (/pixel/hr based on 4 1000 s frames. They used 12) Tj
-150.75 -13.5 TD -0.0158 Tc 0.5613 Tw (times the average standard deviation of the dark distribution, or 144 e) Tj
338.25 5.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf
0.2527 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj
3 -5.25 TD /F1 12 Tf
0.0987 Tc 0.6513 Tw (/pixel/hr as) Tj
-341.25 -14.25 TD -0.0973 Tc 1.5396 Tw (the threshold for hot pixel formation. In contrast the WFC3 E2V CCD43s have) Tj
0 -13.5 TD 0.1308 Tc 0.6192 Tw (<0.1 e) Tj
30.75 5.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf
0.2527 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj
3 -5.25 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.0309 Tc 0.7809 Tw (/pixel/hr dark currents at -83) Tj
139.5 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.3 Tc 0 Tw (\260) Tj
5.25 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.041 Tc 0.8981 Tw (C and the ACS threshold criteria would lead) Tj
-178.5 -15 TD 0.0651 Tc 1.9706 Tw (to a WFC3 threshold of only 13.5 e) Tj
183.75 5.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf
0.2527 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj
3 -5.25 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.0994 Tc 2.6709 Tw (/pixel/hr. Since the readout noise on the) Tj
-186.75 -13.5 TD -0.0388 Tc 0.7888 Tw (WFC3 CCD is 3 e- and the threshold should be significantly higher than 5 sigma) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0705 Tc 1.8205 Tw (to avoid false positive) Tj
109.5 0 TD -0.0529 Tc 2.0302 Tw (, the WFC3 team used fixed rates to define the hot pixel) Tj
-109.5 -13.5 TD -0.0519 Tc 0.3852 Tw (thresholds. The WFC3 dark current requirement is <20 e) Tj
275.25 5.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf
0.2527 Tc 0.6848 Tw (- ) Tj
9 -5.25 TD /F1 12 Tf
0.018 Tc 0.732 Tw (at -83) Tj
28.5 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.3 Tc 0 Tw (\260) Tj
5.25 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
0.246 Tc (C) Tj
8.25 5.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf
0 Tc 0.1875 Tw ( ) Tj
3 -5.25 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.0458 Tc 0.7958 Tw (, so hot pixel) Tj
-329.25 -15 TD 0.0408 Tc 1.6467 Tw (thresholds of 20, 40, 80, 160 and 144 e) Tj
199.5 5.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf
0.2527 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj
3 -5.25 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.0332 Tc 2.6582 Tw (/pixel/hr were studied. \(For the room) Tj
-202.5 -13.5 TD -0.0186 Tc 0.5955 Tw (temperature portion of this study, the hot pixel threshold was defined as the mean) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0621 Tc 0.2496 Tw (plus 5, 10, or 15 times the standard deviation.\)) Tj
0 -27.75 TD -0.0651 Tc 0.2697 Tw (The mean dark current rate change \(from 0.07 to 2 e) Tj
253.5 5.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf
0.2527 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj
3 -5.25 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.1123 Tc 0.2623 Tw (/pixel/hr\) after 2.5 x 109 cm-) Tj
-256.5 -14.25 TD -0.0568 Tc 0.6023 Tw (2 is very modest and well below the requirement of <20 e) Tj
279 5.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf
0.2527 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj
3 -5.25 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.0056 Tc 0.7556 Tw (/pixel/hr at -83) Tj
72.75 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.3 Tc 0 Tw (\260) Tj
5.25 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.1008 Tc 0.8508 Tw (C. Hot) Tj
-360 -14.25 TD -0.0822 Tc 3.7697 Tw (pixels were introduced at a rate of 1200-2400 per month depending on the) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0732 Tc 4.0959 Tw (threshold. The upper and lower bounds for annealing rates at +30) Tj
357 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.3 Tc 0 Tw (\260) Tj
5.25 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.1035 Tc 4.6035 Tw (C was) Tj
-362.25 -14.25 TD -0.043 Tc 0.4649 Tw (determined to be 80-97%. At these rates the number of hot pixels after 5 years on) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0554 Tc 0.4524 Tw (orbit is expected to be between 0.5 to 5%. The difference in the shape of the dark) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.068 Tc 0.743 Tw (current distribution \(pre- and post-anneal\) was very significant, indicating that the) Tj
T* -0.0587 Tc 0.4962 Tw (annealing rates vary substantially over the range of signal levels. The pronounced) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0335 Tc 1.7835 Tw (temperature dependence of the hot pixels at any threshold argues that the CCD) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0539 Tc 3.8664 Tw (should be operated at as cold a temperature as possible. This temperature) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0634 Tc 1.4384 Tw (dependence, as well as the impact of threshold selection, makes it quite difficult) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0441 Tc 0.7941 Tw (to compare results between instruments. Nevertheless the excellent annealing we) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0335 Tc 0.846 Tw (observed on the WFC3 CCD show that a monthly soak at +30) Tj
309 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.3 Tc 0 Tw (\260) Tj
5.25 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.0759 Tc 1.5759 Tw (C is an effective) Tj
-314.25 -14.25 TD -0.0872 Tc 1.6944 Tw (mitigation for the hot pixel problem. Finally, we note that the community still) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0271 Tc 2.0464 Tw (does not understand the behavior of the hot pixels in terms of expected defect) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0671 Tc 0 Tw (properties.) Tj
0 -27.75 TD -0.0534 Tc 2.8489 Tw (For more details, see \223Hot pixel behavior in WFC3 CCD detectors irradiated) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0548 Tc 1.7048 Tw (under operational conditions,\224 Elizabeth J. ) Tj
216 0 TD 0.0098 Tc -0.0098 Tw (Polidan, ) Tj
45 0 TD -0.021 Tc -0.729 Tw (Augustyn ) Tj
51.75 0 TD 0.0249 Tc 2.2251 Tw (Waczynski, Paul) Tj
-312.75 -13.5 TD -0.0814 Tc 3.286 Tw (W. Marshall, Scott D. Johnson, Cheryl Marshall, Robert A. Reed, Randy A.) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.1239 Tc 3.8739 Tw (Kimble, Gregory) Tj
0 Tc -0.75 Tw ( ) Tj
90.75 0 TD -0.0756 Tc 3.5041 Tw (Delo, David Schlossberg, Anne Marie Russell, Terry Beck,) Tj
-90.75 -13.5 TD -0.0711 Tc 1.3211 Tw (Yiting Wen, John ) Tj
95.25 0 TD -0.0658 Tc 3.4408 Tw (Yagelowich, Robert J. Hill, and Edward J.) Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
227.25 0 TD -0.0755 Tc 3.4505 Tw (Wassell, to be) Tj
-322.5 -14.25 TD -0.0883 Tc 0.0883 Tw (published in the SPIE ) Tj
108 0 TD -0.0117 Tc 1.2617 Tw (Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation) Tj
222.75 0 TD -0.013 Tc 0.763 Tw ( Proceedings,) Tj
-330.75 -13.5 TD -0.0835 Tc 0.0835 Tw (August 2003.) Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
17 0 obj
<>stream
BT
126 709.5 TD
0 0 0 rg
/F1 12 Tf
-0.0037 Tc 0.4128 Tw (implanted diode volume relies on charge collection by drift, and charge collection) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0946 Tc 1.5009 Tw (from the surrounding material is due to diffusion charge) Tj
276.75 0 TD -0.0377 Tc 2.1002 Tw ( that reaches the central) Tj
-276.75 -13.5 TD -0.0943 Tc 0.5943 Tw (volume from lateral and from vertical diffusion. The implanted diode has a ) Tj
363.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (14 ) Tj
15.75 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.162 Tc (m) Tj
7.5 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.336 Tc (m) Tj
-387 -15 TD -0.0606 Tc 1.3731 Tw (diameter and nominal 1 ) Tj
122.25 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.162 Tc 0 Tw (m) Tj
7.5 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.1012 Tc 2.0699 Tw (m thickness, and the remaining \(vast majority\) of the) Tj
-129.75 -14.25 TD -0.0958 Tc 0.5244 Tw (pixel volume is considered to be field free.) Tj
0 -27.75 TD -0.0558 Tc 1.0942 Tw (The small size of the pixel\222s collection diode would normally result in very poor) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0893 Tc 2.7143 Tw (quantum efficiency. However in our case each pixel incorporates a micro-lens) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0565 Tc 1.7873 Tw (structure to focus light across the spectral band of interest to the pixel\222s central) Tj
T* -0.0697 Tc 0.9447 Tw (collection volume. This structure helps solve one of the most troubling problems) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0868 Tc 0.7118 Tw (in producing LWIR detectors since defects located in the pixel\222s field free regions) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0401 Tc 3.2276 Tw (do not compromise the dark current and operability of the array. Using this) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0305 Tc 5.2123 Tw (structure the detector quantum efficiency is 54% \(in the absence of any) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.058 Tc 1.933 Tw (antireflective coatings\) based on measurements of the focal plane output versus) Tj
T* -0.0616 Tc 0.3616 Tw (photon irradiance. The median pre-irradiation pixel dark current is <0.05 ) Tj
352.5 0 TD 0.112 Tc 0.638 Tw (pA at 40) Tj
-352.5 -14.25 TD -0.0988 Tc 0.3488 Tw (K and the array has excellent ) Tj
142.5 0 TD -0.0324 Tc 0.2199 Tw (responsivity uniformity \(sigma/mean ~ 4%\).) Tj
-142.5 -27.75 TD -0.0315 Tc 3.7815 Tw (The practical consequences of charge sharing in this lateral diffusion based) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0557 Tc 4.7224 Tw (structure are especially important in comparison to the expected cross-talk) Tj
T* -0.0655 Tc 0.8155 Tw (characteristics of the more traditional ) Tj
186 0 TD -0.0637 Tc 1.7137 Tw (HgCdTe diode architecture. Typically the) Tj
-186 -14.25 TD -0.0644 Tc 0.2311 Tw (entire diode area is covered by a thin \(~1 ) Tj
198.75 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.162 Tc 0 Tw (m) Tj
7.5 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.0423 Tc 0.6673 Tw (m\) diode with a thicker \(~10 ) Tj
144 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.162 Tc 0 Tw (m) Tj
7.5 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.2254 Tc 1.7254 Tw (m\) field) Tj
-357.75 -14.25 TD -0.0178 Tc 1.1769 Tw (free region underneath, and the IR response relies almost exclusively on vertical) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0182 Tc 0.3396 Tw (diffusion. In comparing our case of ) Tj
177.75 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (60 ) Tj
15.75 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.162 Tc (m) Tj
7.5 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.0376 Tc 0.6001 Tw (m pitch and 16 ) Tj
77.25 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.162 Tc 0 Tw (m) Tj
7.5 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.1137 Tc 1.3637 Tw (m diffusion length, we) Tj
-285.75 -14.25 TD -0.0645 Tc 0.5645 Tw (see that 78% of the pixel area is within 1 diffusion length of a neighboring pixel\222s) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0554 Tc 3.5326 Tw (boundary and also its depletion volume. The expected charge sharing from) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0132 Tc 1.6632 Tw (particle transients consequently approaches 100% in the sense that nearly every) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0556 Tc 3.3681 Tw (hit will involve multiple pixels. For the lateral collection device we tested,) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0667 Tc 4.9128 Tw (whether we use number of pixels or amount of charge as a metric, our) Tj
T* -0.0576 Tc 2.3826 Tw (measurements indicate less than 15% cross-talk in all cases. Consequently, we) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0402 Tc 0.3129 Tw (recognize the lateral collection approach as a tremendous advantage in this regard,) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0367 Tc 2.8492 Tw (and the number of corrupted pixels due to particle strikes should be reduced) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.048 Tc 0 Tw (substantially.) Tj
0 -27 TD -0.0687 Tc 5.975 Tw (For more information, please see \223Proton-Induced Transients and Charge) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0625 Tc 3.4375 Tw (Collection Measurements in a LWIR) Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
195.75 0 TD -0.0046 Tc 3.7546 Tw (HgCdTe Focal Plane Array,\224 Paul W.) Tj
-195.75 -13.5 TD -0.094 Tc 1.344 Tw (Marshall, John E. ) Tj
91.5 0 TD -0.0396 Tc 2.0083 Tw (Hubbs, Douglas C. Arrington, Cheryl J. Marshall, Robert A.) Tj
-91.5 -14.25 TD -0.0513 Tc 1.1013 Tw (Reed, George Gee, James C. ) Tj
146.25 0 TD -0.052 Tc 1.8333 Tw (Pickel, and Rodolfo A. Ramos, to be published in) Tj
-146.25 -13.5 TD -0.0533 Tc 0.2676 Tw (the Dec. 2003 IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.) Tj
-36 -27.75 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (3. ) Tj
18 0 TD -0.0352 Tc 0.1186 Tw (HST Wide Field Camera 3 E2V Charge Coupled Device \(CCD\)) Tj
ET
108 165 306 0.75 re f
BT
126 139.5 TD
-0.0946 Tc 2.7484 Tw (The n-CCD has a format of 2048 x 4096 pixels with a 15 ) Tj
311.25 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.162 Tc 0 Tw (m) Tj
7.5 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.0905 Tc 3.0905 Tw (m pixel size, ) Tj
2.922 Tc 0 Tw (a) Tj
-318.75 -14.25 TD -0.0442 Tc 3.9609 Tw (supplemental buried channel, a multi-phase pinned implant, and is backside) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0834 Tc 0.9834 Tw (illuminated. The detector response was evaluated for a range ) Tj
303 0 TD -0.0615 Tc 0.5615 Tw (of 63 ) Tj
33.75 0 TD 0.112 Tc 0.638 Tw (MeV proton) Tj
-336.75 -13.5 TD -0.1601 Tc 0.5351 Tw (fluences from 1 x 10) Tj
98.25 5.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf
0.375 Tc 0 Tw (3) Tj
4.5 -5.25 TD /F1 12 Tf
0.543 Tc -0.543 Tw ( cm) Tj
17.25 5.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf
0.3139 Tc 0 Tw (-2) Tj
7.5 -5.25 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.1357 Tc 1.0733 Tw ( to 2.5 x 10) Tj
57 5.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf
0.375 Tc 0 Tw (9) Tj
4.5 -5.25 TD /F1 12 Tf
0.543 Tc 0.207 Tw ( cm) Tj
18 5.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf
0.3139 Tc 0 Tw (-2) Tj
7.5 -5.25 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.1264 Tc 1.1576 Tw ( for a range of beam intensities. The) Tj
-214.5 -13.5 TD -0.0839 Tc 7.3339 Tw (devices were irradiated while operating inside a) Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
279 0 TD -0.0167 Tc 7.5167 Tw (dewar, and annealing) Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
12 0 obj
<>stream
BT
90 708.75 TD
0 0 0 rg
/F0 12.75 Tf
0.1371 Tc -0.1579 Tw (Key Proton Test Findings for Sensor Technologies Evaluated in FY03) Tj
0 -42 TD /F1 12 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw (1.) Tj
9 0 TD /F2 12 Tf
-0.336 Tw ( ) Tj
9 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.0647 Tc 0.0647 Tw (CIDTEC 818) Tj
ET
90 664.5 81 0.75 re f
BT
126 639 TD
-0.0433 Tc 0.5683 Tw (Charge injection device \(CID\) technology is investigated by the Mission Research) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0596 Tc 4.8721 Tw (Corporation \(MRC\) as a niche application. The CID was a product of ) Tj
5.172 Tc 0 Tw (a) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0403 Tc 1.4653 Tw (development effort initiated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, under the ) Tj
361.5 0 TD -0.026 Tc 0 Tw (Europa) Tj
-361.5 -13.5 TD -0.0541 Tc 2.4541 Tw (Orbiter program, which required a highly radiation- tolerant imager that could) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0259 Tc 1.3759 Tw (withstand the high-energy electron environment around Jupiter. The devices do) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0726 Tc 0.8226 Tw (not have nearly the performance of a charge coupled device \(CCD\) but they have) Tj
T* -0.0333 Tc 5.4878 Tw (the advantage that they are not subject to the charge transfer efficiency) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0337 Tc 0.8414 Tw (degradation that is so critical to CCD performance in space. CIDs have also been) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0827 Tc 0.948 Tw (built which have high total ionizing dose tolerance. On the downside, CIDs have) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0861 Tc 0.6218 Tw (a higher read noise inherent in the design in which the output amplifier must \224see\224) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0726 Tc 1.2511 Tw (the capacitance of the entire device, whereas the CCD has a very low read noise) Tj
T* -0.1038 Tc 4.2288 Tw (due to a small readout capacitor. Also there is only one vendor for CID) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.1435 Tc 0 Tw (technology.) Tj
0 -27.75 TD -0.138 Tc 0.888 Tw (The CID816 is a ) Tj
85.5 0 TD -0.0037 Tc 1.3787 Tw (frontside illuminated pre-amplifier per column design variation) Tj
-85.5 -13.5 TD -0.0763 Tc 3.69 Tw (of the charge injection device \(CID\) manufactured by CIDTEC. MRC and) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0528 Tc 2.9028 Tw (NASA-GSFC collaborated to proton test the device. The pre-irradiation read) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0783 Tc 0.8752 Tw (noise is 200 electrons at 50 kHz. No increase in the read noise was observed out) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0156 Tc 0.0156 Tw (to ~30 ) Tj
33.75 0 TD -0.081 Tc 0 Tw (krad) Tj
21 0 TD -0.246 Tc (\() Tj
3.75 0 TD -0.0432 Tc 1.0659 Tw (Si\) although there was a significant increase in the read fixed pattern) Tj
-58.5 -13.5 TD -0.1164 Tc 0 Tw (noise) Tj
25.5 5.25 TD /F1 8.25 Tf
0.375 Tc (1) Tj
4.5 -5.25 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.0437 Tc 3.9437 Tw ( and nonlinearity beginning around 20) Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
208.5 0 TD 0.186 Tc (krad\() Tj
25.5 0 TD -0.0734 Tc 4.3859 Tw (Si\). These increases are) Tj
-264 -14.25 TD -0.0617 Tc 3.7492 Tw (attributed to changes in the operating point of the readout amplifiers. The) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0641 Tc 3.4051 Tw (transient response to radiation is consistent with that expected for the active) Tj
0 -14.25 TD -0.0622 Tc 0.9622 Tw (region size, and is similar to that seen for other ) Tj
236.25 0 TD 0.0009 Tc 1.1241 Tw (unthinned devices of other types) Tj
-236.25 -13.5 TD -0.11 Tc 0.11 Tw (\(e.g.: ) Tj
27 0 TD -0.018 Tc 0.018 Tw (CCDs, ) Tj
36 0 TD -0.0388 Tc 0.2888 Tw (APSs, hybridized PN junctions\).) Tj
-63 -27.75 TD -0.0767 Tc 2.1017 Tw (For more information, please see \223Advanced charge injection devices for space) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0402 Tc 3.3402 Tw (instruments,\224 Kyle Miller and Kathy Doughty,) Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
246.75 0 TD -0.057 Tc 4.107 Tw (to be published in the SPIE) Tj
-246.75 -14.25 TD -0.0117 Tc 0.5117 Tw (Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation) Tj
220.5 0 TD -0.0467 Tc 0.2967 Tw ( Proceedings, August 2003.) Tj
-256.5 -41.25 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (2. ) Tj
18 0 TD -0.1327 Tc 0.5077 Tw (HgCdTe Hybrid at >11 ) Tj
114 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.162 Tc 0 Tw (m) Tj
7.5 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.336 Tc (m) Tj
ET
108 222.75 129 0.75 re f
BT
126 196.5 TD
-0.0732 Tc 1.5732 Tw (Our test article is a large-format ) Tj
165 0 TD -0.0738 Tc 0.8238 Tw (HgCdTe LWIR ) Tj
81 0 TD -0.0093 Tc 2.0092 Tw (HgCdTe focal plane assembly) Tj
-246 -13.5 TD -0.0742 Tc 1.4492 Tw (with a pixel pitch of 60 ) Tj
123 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.162 Tc 0 Tw (m) Tj
7.5 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.0372 Tc 1.4122 Tw (m and a cutoff wavelength exceeding ) Tj
191.25 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (11 ) Tj
16.5 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
-0.162 Tc (m) Tj
7.5 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.1071 Tc 1.9821 Tw (m. It is a) Tj
-345.75 -15 TD -0.0408 Tc 2.2908 Tw (state-of-the-art detector but has not been selected as a flight candidate for any) Tj
0 -13.5 TD -0.0534 Tc 1.0534 Tw (NASA programs. The detectors were grown by molecular-beam ) Tj
322.5 0 TD -0.027 Tc 1.527 Tw (epitaxy \(MBE\)) Tj
-322.5 -14.25 TD -0.375 Tc -0.375 Tw (on ) Tj
15 0 TD -0.0753 Tc 1.0128 Tw (CdZnTe substrates using a ) Tj
134.25 0 TD -0.0063 Tc 1.2563 Tw (planarized double layer ) Tj
121.5 0 TD 0 Tc 1.4995 Tw (heterojunction design. As) Tj
-270.75 -13.5 TD -0.0702 Tc 0.8202 Tw (depicted in Figure 1, the detectors utilize lateral collection diodes so that only the) Tj
-36 -26.25 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
90 0 TD ( ) Tj
ET
90 102.75 144 0.75 re f
BT
90 93.75 TD
/F2 6.75 Tf
-0.003 Tc (1) Tj
3.75 -5.25 TD /F2 11.25 Tf
0 Tc -0.1275 Tw ( ) Tj
3 0 TD /F1 11.25 Tf
-0.1413 Tc 0.3288 Tw (The read fixed pattern noise is a measurement of the spatial variation of read noise measured) Tj
-6.75 -12.75 TD -0.1439 Tc 0.3314 Tw (across all pixels.) Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<11 mm, HST Wide Field Camera 3 E2V Charge Coupled Device \(CCD\), HST Wide Field Camera 3 1.7 mm Rockwell HgCdTe FPA, Proton Response of James Webb Space Telescope \(JWST\) MWIR Hybrids, FY03, Proton test results)/ModDate(D:20110705105043-04'00')/Producer(Acrobat PDFWriter 4.05 for Windows NT)/Subject( Sensor Technologies Evaluated in FY03)/Title(Key Proton Test Findings for Sensor Technologies Evaluated in FY03)>>
endobj
xref
0 33
0000000000 65535 f
0000000000 00000 f
0000008191 00000 n
0000000016 00000 n
0000004978 00000 n
0000004870 00000 n
0000041721 00000 n
0000044076 00000 n
0000008218 00000 n
0000009275 00000 n
0000042788 00000 n
0000043843 00000 n
0000035947 00000 n
0000000000 00000 f
0000015108 00000 n
0000016144 00000 n
0000005112 00000 n
0000029448 00000 n
0000000000 00000 f
0000005228 00000 n
0000022467 00000 n
0000000000 00000 f
0000005344 00000 n
0000016381 00000 n
0000000000 00000 f
0000005460 00000 n
0000009514 00000 n
0000000000 00000 f
0000005576 00000 n
0000005682 00000 n
0000000000 00000 f
0000000077 00000 n
0000044325 00000 n
trailer
<]>>
startxref
44874
%%EOF