| 
  
    | Basic Information Regarding Tin Whiskers |     
  
    
          What are Tin Whiskers?  
    What are the
    Mechanisms by which Tin Whiskers Form?
 
    What
are the Risks/Failure Mechanisms Associated with Tin Whiskers?
    Why
the Recent Attention to Tin Whiskers?
    What
are the Commonly Reported Characteristics of Tin Whiskers?
    Suggestions for Reducing Risk of Tin
Whisker Induced Failures 
 
          
          What are Tin Whiskers?   Tin
whiskers are electrically conductive, crystalline structures of tin that
sometimes grow from surfaces where tin (especially electroplated tin) is used as a final finish. 
 Tin whiskers have been observed to grow to
lengths of several millimeters (mm) and in rare instances to lengths in excess
 of 10 mm.  Numerous electronic system failures have been attributed to
short circuits caused by tin whiskers that bridge closely-spaced circuit elements maintained at
different electrical potentials.   Tin
whiskers are not a new phenomenon.  Indeed, the first published reports of
tin whiskers date back to the 1940s and 1950s.  Tin
is only one of several metals that is known to be capable of growing
whiskers.  Other examples of metals that may form whiskers include
some tin alloys, zinc, cadmium, indium, antimony, silver among others .    People
sometimes confuse the term "whiskers" with a more familiar phenomenon
known as "dendrites" commonly formed by electrochemical migration
processes.  Therefore, it is important to note here
that whiskers and dendrites are two very different phenomena. A
"Whisker" generally has the shape of a very thin, single filament or
hair-like protrusion that emerges outward (z-axis) from a surface. 
"Dendrites", on the other hand, form in fern-like or snowflake-like
patterns growing along a surface (x-y plane) rather than outward from it. 
The growth mechanism for dendrites is well-understood and requires some type of moisture
capable of dissolving the metal (e.g., tin) into a solution of metal ions which
are then redistributed by electromigration in the presence of an electromagnetic
field.  While the precise mechanism for whisker formation remains unknown,
it is known that whisker formation does NOT require either dissolution of the
metal NOR the presence of electromagnetic field. 
 
  
    |  Tin "Whisker" shown
      above growing between pure tin-plated hook terminals of an electromagnetic
      relay
similar to MIL-R-6106 (LDC 8913)
 Photo Courtesy of Andre Pelham (Intern)
 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
 | "Dendrites" are NOT "Whiskers"
  "Dendrites" shown above are NOT the same
      phenomenon as "whiskers"
 |  
 More
Examples of Metal Whiskers on EEE Parts and Associated Hardware   
 What are the Mechanisms by which
Tin Whiskers Form?The mechanisms by which tin whiskers grow have been
studied for many years.       A single accepted explanation    of
the mechanisms has NOT been established.  Some theories suggest that tin
whiskers may grow in response to a mechanism of stress relief (especially
"compressive" stress) within the tin plating.  Other theories contend that growth may be attributable to
recrystallization and abnormal grain growth processes affecting the tin grain
structure which may or may not be affected by residual stress in the tin plated
film.
    Those
advocating "stress" as crucial for metal whisker formation point to
some commonly accepted factors
that can impart additional residual stress: 
  Residual stresses within the tin
    plating caused by factors such as the plating chemistry and process.
    Electroplated finishes (especially "bright" finishes) appear to be
    most
    susceptible to whisker formation reportedly because bright tin plating processes
    can introduce greater residual stresses than other plating processes.   Intermetallic Formation:
    The diffusion of the substrate material into the tin plating (or vice versa)
    can lead to formation of
    intermetallic compounds (such as Cu6Sn5 for a Sn over
    Cu system) that alter
    the lattice spacing in the tin plating.  The change in lattice spacing
    may impart stresses to the tin plating that may be relieved through the
    formation of tin whiskers.
    Externally Applied Compressive
    Stresses such as
    those introduced by torquing of a nut or
    a screw or clamping against a tin-coated surface can sometimes produce
    regions of whisker growth.
    Bending or Stretching of the
    surface after plating (such as during lead-formation prior to mounting of an
    electronic component)
    Scratches or nicks in the
    plating and/or the substrate material introduced by handling,
    probing, etc.
    Coefficient of Thermal Expansion
    Mismatches between the plating material
    and substrate 
 
 What
are the Risks/Failure Mechanisms Associated with Tin Whiskers?Tin whiskers pose a serious reliability risk to electronic assemblies. 
Several instances have been reported where  tin whiskers have caused system
failures in both earth and space-based applications.  To date, there are
reports of at least three tin whisker induced short circuits that resulted in complete
failure of on-orbit commercial satellites.  There have also
been whisker-induced failures in medical devices, weapon systems, power plants,
and consumer products.
 The general risks fall into four categories: 
    Stable short circuits in low voltage, high
    impedance circuits. In such circuits there may be insufficient current available to fuse the
  whisker open and a stable short circuit results. Depending on a variety of
    factors including the diameter and
  length of the whisker, it can take more than 50 milliamps (mA) to fuse open a
    tin whisker.
  
  Transient short circuits.
 At atmospheric pressure, if the available current exceeds the fusing current
  of the whisker, the circuit may only experience a transient glitch as the
  whisker fuses open.
  
  Metal Vapor Arc
 If a tin whisker
  initiates a short in an application environment possessing high levels of
  current and voltage, then a VERY DESTRUCTIVE phenomenon known as a Metal
  Vapor Arc can occur.  The ambient pressure, temperature and the
  presence of arc suppressing materials also affect metal vapor arc formation.
  In a metal vapor arc, the solid metal whisker is vaporized into a plasma of
  HIGHLY CONDUCTIVE metal ions (more conductive than the solid whisker itself).
  This plasma can form an ARC capable of carrying HUNDREDS OF AMPERES.
  Such arcs can be sustained for long duration (several seconds) until
  interrupted by circuit protection devices (e.g., fuses, circuit breakers) or
  until other arc extinguishing processes occur. This kind of arcing is
  happening in the metal vapor.  When an arc quenching agent (e.g., air) is
  present, more power must be installed into the event to replace power lost to
  the non-interesting processes happening in the quenching agent. 
  Therefore, as air pressure is reduced, less power is required to initiate and
  sustain a whisker-induced metal vapor arc.  For example, past experiments**
  have demonstrated that at
  atmospheric pressures of about 150 torr, a tin whisker could initiate a
  sustained metal vapor arc where the supply voltage was approximately 13 Volts
  (or greater) and supply current was 15 Amps (or greater).  Tin (or other
  materials) from the adjacent surfaces can help to sustain the arc until the
  available material is consumed or the supply current is interrupted.  Metal
  vapor arcs in vacuum are
  reported to have occurred on at least three commercial satellites  resulting in blown
  fuses that rendered the spacecraft non-operational.
 **  J.H. Richardson, and B.R. Lasley, "Tin Whisker Initiated Vacuum Metal Arcing in Spacecraft Electronics," 1992 Government Microcircuit Applications Conference, Vol. XVIII, pp. 119 - 122, November 10 - 12, 1992.
  
  Debris/Contamination.
 Whiskers or parts of whiskers may break loose and bridge isolated conductors
  or interfere with optical surfaces
 
 
 Why
the Recent Attention to Tin Whiskers?The current worldwide initiative to
reduce the use of   potentially hazardous
materials such as lead (Pb) is driving the electronics industry to consider
alternatives to the widely used tin-lead alloys used for plating. For example,
the European Union has enacted legislation known as the Restriction of certain
Hazardous Substances (RoHS) and Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE)
Directives which have set June 2006 as deadlines for electronic equipment
suppliers to eliminate most uses of Pb from their products.  It is widely
believed (though reasons remain somewhat of a mystery) that Pb when alloyed with
tin imparts whisker-inhibiting attributes to the final finish.
    With respect to factors such as solderability, ease of manufacture and
compatibility with existing assembly methods,
pure tin plating is seen by the industry as a potentially simple and cost
effective alternative. In fact, many manufacturers have been offering pure tin
plated components as a standard commercial (and in some cases high reliability)
product for years while others are exploring pure tin alternatives for the very
first time.  Many electronics manufacturers have never heard of the
phenomenon of tin whiskers and therefore, may not consider the risks of tin
whisker growth during the validation of new plating systems.     Continuing reports of tin whisker-induced failures coupled with the lack of
an
industry   accepted understanding of tin
whisker growth factors and/or proven and reliable test methods to identify whisker-prone products
has made a blanket acceptance of pure tin
plating a risky proposition for high reliability systems.  Still,
organizations such as NASA and the DoD may soon be faced with few options other
than pure tin plating since the desires of the commercial market for
environmentally friendly components carry far more weight than the
infinitesimally small market share of the high reliability user.  
 What
are the Commonly Reported Characteristics of Tin Whiskers? The
vast disparity in the observations reported by different experimenters is
evidence of the complications associated with understanding and controlling tin
whiskers.  The
following list is intended to provide a very basic overview of some of the
observed characteristics of tin
whiskers.   
  
    Shapes:  Whiskers
    may be straight, kinked,
    hooked or forked. Their outer surfaces are often
    grooved.  Some growths may form as nodules or pyramidal structures.
    Incubation
    (Dormancy) Period: Experimenters report the incubation period may range from days
    to years.  This attribute of whisker growth is particularly concerning
    because meaningful experiments to determine the propensity for a particular
    process to form whiskers may need to span very long periods of time.
    Growth
    Rate: Growth rates from 0.03 to 9 mm/yr have been reported. 
    Growth is highly variable and is likely to be determined by a
    complex relationship of factors including plating chemistry, plating
    thickness, substrate
    materials, grain structure and environmental storage conditions.
    Whisker Length:  Whiskers
    as long as a few millimeters are not uncommon with some experimenters
    observing whiskers in excess of 10 mm (400 mils) in length. Only a few
    researchers have measured the distribution of whisker lengths for specific
    specimens.  Invariably, these researchers report the length
    distribution fits a lognormal distribution. 
    Whisker
    Diameter:  Typical diameters are a few microns with some reports in
    excess of 10 um and rarely less than 100 nm.
    Environmental
    Factors:  There is a great deal of contradictory information
    regarding environmental factors that might affect whisker formation.  Several
    organizations are attempting to devise accelerated test methods to determine
    a particular plating process's propensity to form tin whiskers. 
    However, to date, there are no accepted test methods for evaluating whisker
    propensity.  Indeed, much of the experimental data compiled to date has
    produced contradictory findings regarding which factors accelerate
    (or retard) whisker growth.
     
      |  | Temperature:
        Some experimenters report that
        ambient temperatures of approximately 50°C are optimal for whisker
        formation, while othersobserve that room temperatures (22°C to 25°C)
        grow whiskers faster.  Reportedly, whisker growth ceases at
        temperatures above 150°C
 |  |  | Pressure: 
        Whiskers will grow in vacuum as well as earth based atmospheric
        pressure. |  |  | Moisture: Some observe that whiskers form more readily in high
        humidity (85% RH) whereas others report moisture is not a contributing
        factor |  |  | Thermal
        Cycling:  Some experimenters report that thermal cycling
        increases the growth rate of whiskers, but others report no effect due
        to thermal cycling. |  |  | Electric
        Field:  Whiskers
    grow spontaneously without requiring an applied electric field to encourage
        their growth.  Some recent observations of tin whisker induced
        field problems in the commercial sector seem to suggest that an electric
        field could stimulate whisker growth, but more analysis is required to
        confirm these effects (if any).  GSFC has demonstrated that whiskers can
        bend due to the forces of electrostatic attraction thus increasing the
        likelihood of tin whisker shorts (ref.
        to GSFC experiment #4). |  Whisker
    Prone Processes:  There is tremendous debate in the industry
    regarding which plating processes are prone to whisker
    formation.  Most of the literature agrees that "pure
    tin" electroplated surfaces (especially those that employ brighteners
    in the plating process) are the most susceptible to whisker formation. 
    There are also reports that tin-lead plating can grow whiskers;
    however, such whiskers are generally reported to be less than 50um long.  
 
 Suggestions for Reducing Risk of Tin
Whisker Induced Failures:  The
uncertainties associated with tin whisker growth make it extremely difficult to
predict if/when tin whiskers may appear. The following list provides some
suggestions for reducing the risk of tin whisker induced failures.      
  
Avoid the use of PURE TIN plated components if possible. Utilization of procurement specifications that have clear
restrictions against the use of pure tin plating is highly recommended. Most
(but not all) of the commonly used military specifications currently
have prohibitions against pure tin plating. Studies have shown that alloying tin
with a second metal reduces the propensity for  whisker
growth. Alloys of tin and lead are generally considered to be acceptable where
the alloy contains a minimum of 3% lead by
weight. Although some experimenters have reported whisker growth from tin-lead
    alloys, such whiskers have also been reported to be dramatically smaller
    than those from pure tin plated surfaces and are believed to sufficiently
    small so as not to pose a significant risk for the geometries of today's
    microelectronics.Post Procurement  It can be dangerous to rely
    on the part manufacturer's certification that pure tin plating was not used
    in the production of the product supplied. NASA GSFC is aware of several
    instances where the procurement specification required "No Pure Tin", but
    the product supplied was later determined to be pure tin.  In some of
    these instances, tin whisker growths were also discovered.  Users are
    advised to analyze the plating composition of the products received as an
    independent verification. When simple avoidance of pure tin
plating is not a viable option (such as in cases where its use is discovered
late in system integration/test), then the following approaches may also be
considered to reduce risk.
 
  
    Solder Dip the plated
    surfaces
sufficiently using a tin-lead solder to completely reflow and alloy the
tin plating. Obviously, special precautions are required
to prevent thermal shock induced damage, to
prevent loss of hermeticity and to avoid thermal degradation.
    This approach may have limited success since it may be difficult to ensure that
    the entire surface is properly reflowed. See the April
    2004 Photo of the Month for one example of the limitations associated
    with this particular mitigation strategy.
     Replate the whisker prone
    areas. Some manufacturers may be willing to strip
the pure tin plate from finished products and re-plate
using a suitable alternate plating material such
as tin/lead or Nickel.  Caution is advised if considering use of an
    external plated finish (e.g., Sn-Pb or Cu) on top of an existing pure tin
    deposit.  There is some evidence that whiskers may still form from the
    pure tin layer and protrude through the thin external deposit. 
     Conformal Coat or foam
      encapsulation over
    the whisker prone surface can significantly reduce the risk of electrical
    short circuits caused by whiskers.  The choice of coating material,
    thickness and possible degradation with time/environmental exposure can
    impact the effectiveness of the coating. NASA GSFC
    experiments have shown that use of Arathane 5750 (formerly Uralane 5750) conformal
    when applied uniformly to a nominal 2 to 3 mils thickness can provide
    significant benefit by containing whisker growth outward through the
    coating. This coating is also resistant to being penetrated by whiskers
    attempting to puncture the coating from the outside.
     See also the following research
    by Dr. Tom Woodrow (Boeing) in which he evaluated 6
    different conformal coat materials for purposes of inhibiting whisker
    formation and subsequent shorting hazards. 
     
    It has
also been observed experimentally that conformal coating
can restrict the availability of tin   sufficiently
to minimize the risk of plasma formation during a shorting event. However,
    such
factors as the minimum thickness of conformal coating necessary
to prevent plasma formation have
not been determined. Similarly, it has been
shown that foam can prevent sustained arcing but
the effects of foam type, foam density, pore size etc.
have not been evaluated. 
   Evaluate Application
    Specific Risks.  A variety of application specific considerations
    may be used to assess the risk of whisker induced failures and assist in
    making "use as-is" or "repair/replace" decisions. 
    These factors include circuit geometries that are sufficiently large to
    preclude the risk of a tin whisker short, mission criticality, mission
    duration, collateral risk of rework, schedule and cost. To assist in
    evaluating application specific risks, David Pinsky (Raytheon) has developed
    a tin
    whisker risk assessment algorithm which can be reviewed Note: 
    reference to this algorithm herein DOES NOT imply endorsement by NASA
 
 In 2002, Dr. Mike Osterman (CALCE Center at the University of Maryland)
    published a white
    paper outlining pros and cons of assorted strategies for mitigating risks
    associated with tin whiskers.
 
 |